Before an official version of all the inconsistencies saturated, it becomes logical, even healthy, develop doubts and questioning. However, since many questions and anomalies arise and tend to us Stagger particularly sinister implications, it is important to ensure that every avenue is explored fully before jumping to conclusions, whatever they are. After all, it's not every day we are called to drastically alter our perception society; know in depth on 11 September certainly has this ability to face potentially devastating.
However, open their eyes to what surrounds us - the facts surrounding the events of September 11, in this case - is a critical step to realize our real environment and then be able to achieve a certain strength lies in knowledge and expertise.
is why it is not advisable to draw hasty conclusions without first having asked some fundamental questions, those that go straight to the point. Starting with those that follow.
The World Trade Center buildings, including Building 7, were they intentionally destroyed with explosives or other? Thousands of people were present at the scene that day. Obviously, if this were the case, do not we end up at least some evidence pointing in that direction?
Come if you can find such evidence, consider starting with the first news reports broadcast live Sept. 11. Consider first the words of Stephen Evans, a BBC journalist who was on the ground floor of the World Trade Center morning of 11 September.
"I was sitting on the ground floor of the building and waited for someone to join me. [...] There was a huge bang. I felt like someone had just escaped a big container filled with waste from a high distance on the terrace between the two huge towers of the World Trade Center. I thought to myself, something just happened on a construction zone. But a few seconds later, there were two or three similar huge explosions and the building literally shook. [...]» W227
Two or three similar explosions in the first seconds after the impact? Here then reported that Rick Sanchez live on MSNBC.
"[...] We are at the height of [the street] Chambers, which puts us about a block and half from the site where the explosion occurred. This area has just been evacuated because the police discovered what they described as a suspicious device and they fear it could lead to another explosion. Obviously, everyone is on guard here on the police. I talked to police officials moments ago, Chris, and they said they had reason to believe that an explosion at the World Trade Center, separate from that which was caused by the impact of the plane against the building could have been caused by a van which was parked in the building and could have contained an explosive device inside. So they fear that there explosive devices hidden in the building or the surrounding area and that is why they are so cautious. [...]» W220
we learn that the police had discovered a 'suspicious device'. There are also the words non-negligible an explosion in the parking underground explosion - distinct from that caused by aircraft impact. Then continue with the story of Pat Dawson from NBC, live from September 11.
"[...] A few moments ago, I spoke with the Head of the Department of Fire Safety of the City of New York [Albert Turi], which was obviously one of the first to be here on the scene after two planes are crushed against the front, we assume, the World Trade Center [...]. Essentially, he [Albert Turi] received an indication of a secondary device, which means another bomb explodes. He tried to evacuate his men as quickly as possible, but he said that another explosion occurred. Then, an hour after the initial impact, he said there was another explosion in one of the towers, then obviously, according to his theory, he believes that gear [explosives] were placed in building. He thinks that one of the secondary gear [detonated] after the initial impact may have been aboard the plane that crashed against one of the towers. The second device, he speculates, was probably hidden in the building. That's what we said Albert Turi, Chief of Security Fire Department City of New York, he told me that there are a few moments ago. [...]» W221
Pat Dawson chained then adding that explosions were still heard at the time of reporting, but they were nevertheless the result of gas lines severed. Was it a gas line that was responsible for the explosion reported by Marlene Cruz, an employee of the World Trade Center, on the airwaves of ABC? Note how this place was at the time of the explosion.
"Peter Jennings: 'Tell me, how do you feel, how have you found there, and that has happened to you? "
Marlene Cruz: 'I work as a carpenter at the World Trade Center. I was about to go do a job and I took the elevator loading. I heard the first explosion went off and the elevator, the doors have exploded and fell. I was lucky that the elevator gets stuck between two floors ... '
Peter Jennings: "What story?"
Marlene Cruz: 'The B-story - in the basement, where mechanics. And all co-workers have left the man and myself to the elevator, screaming. [...]» W222
Marlene Cruz's testimony was corroborated by his colleague, Arthur Del Bianco, who brought in an interview broadcast on NBC when it finally reached to reach the ground floor, he heard what he described as sound, similar to gunshots, and then, then three big explosions. " W226
Without going to say they are lacking, what are the odds that a gas line would have resulted in these explosions over 1000 feet [300 meters] from the initial impact of the plane? Conversely, is it possible that explosives have been previously placed at the base of the towers to weaken the support columns? This was precisely the question that arose in this CNN reporter live on September 11.
"We have been informed about secondary explosions after the plane crashed, to see if there was not something else at the base of the towers which is really the coup de grace to be thrown. [...]» W223
What was by Moreover, the immediate reaction of journalist Don Dahler, live on air at ABC News during the collapse of the South Tower?
"[...] I find myself to four quads of the World Trade Center. The second building being hit by a plane has just completely collapsed. The entire building has just collapsed as if a demolition team had fired, as in the demolition of old buildings. He collapsed on itself, and it's gone now. [...]» W224
Note also the remarks could not be more categorical Presenter News CNBC, live on September 11 after the second tower collapsed.
"[...] This is clear - the way that the structure gave way - this is the result of something that was planned. It is not accidental that the first round will be simply collapsed and then the second tower has collapsed in exactly the same way. How they did it, we do not know. [...]»
then observe the response of various individuals from the emergency services of the City of New York. Begin with this discussion between Captain Dennis Tardio and Patrick Zoda, both firefighters from Fire Station 7. The following excerpt is from the Naudet brothers' documentary on September 11.
"Captain Dennis Tardio:" We went back down to the [ground floor of a tower] and we realized that they [colleagues] had left the command post. We knew we were in trouble. "
Patrick Zoda: 'We are descended. It was in much worse condition than when we were assembled. Correct? [When] we got, everything was organized. We went downstairs, was devastated. " Captain Dennis Tardio
: 'We went down to the entrance. It was a fucking war zone. There was nobody there. Damn, where were they? What do we do? We went out, we walked around a quadrangle? "
Patrick Zoda: 'We walked at least two quads. " Captain Dennis Tardio
: 'Two quadrilaterals. "
Patrick Zoda: 'And we started to run. " Captain Dennis Tardio
'Pow-pow-pow-pow-pow-pow-pow! "
Patrick Zoda 'floor by floor, it started to explode. " Captain Dennis Tardio
: 'It was as if it was like they had blown up. "
Patrick Zoda: 'Yes, exploded. " Captain Dennis Tardio
: 'You know, like if there was a plan to throw a building on the ground. Boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom! " [...]» W225
Is this a perception isolated from these firefighters? To find out, enchaînons with an excerpt from the interview report of the tactical team conducted September 11 October 3, 2001 with Commissioner Stephen Gregory, who was also the site of the World Trade Center. This report, along with several other cities later, is publicly available via the archives of The New York Times.
"[...] Q: Do you remember ˝ of any battalion whose vehicles could be parked near the spot where you were at any time, especially when you were on the West Street? ˝
Answer: Not ˝. I know I was an officer of the division 146, a lieutenant named Evangelista, which eventually phoned me few days later just to see how I was. We both had, for whatever reason - again, I do not know what it's worth with all that was happening at that moment, but for some reason I thought when I looked in the direction of [World] Trade Center before it collapsed, before the number 2 [South Tower] collapsed, I saw flashes of low level. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes on the front of the building, and I in agreement with him because I thought - at that time I did not know what it was. I mean, it could have been the result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then the building collapsed.
˝
Question: Was ˝ Does the bottom of the building or above, where was the fire? ˝
Answer: ˝ No, in the bottom of the building. You know, like when they demolish a building, the way they do explode when it collapses. That's what I'm seeing. And I not raised the issue, it was he who asked me. He said 'I do not know if I'm crazy, but I wanted to ask you because you were standing right beside me. " He said 'Have you seen something by watching the building? " And I said 'What do you mean something? " He said 'Did you see flashes? " I said 'Yes, but I thought it was just me. " He said 'No, I saw them too. " [...]» H2
Coming from a Commissioner on the ground, should we discuss her credibility? In addition, anyone who has ever been witnessing the controlled demolition of a building knows that these flashes are characteristic of the use of explosives. The experts also agree that this is the basis for building a large quantity of explosives must be placed to bring about his downfall. And Commissioner repeated twice that the flashes occurred at the bottom of the building just before it collapses.
Let us open here a parenthesis
to mention an interesting feature that appears later in this same testimony of the Commissioner Gregory.
"[...] Answer: ˝ I heard this morning the tape recording of people calling and they described the plane that hit the building. In fact, there are so many people who saw it. They described how the plane hit. They said it was a military-type plane and it was green and that was that. I mean, I've never seen the color of the aircraft. [...]» H2
The only images available of the first plane hit the north tower at 8:46 (the ones that President Bush has allegedly seen live) are of poor quality and the considerable distance and the angle between the plane and cameraman does not distinguish accurately or shape, or color. Is not it intriguing that so many people have reported a military type aircraft, green, and in the words of the Commissioner, there was no dissenting opinion but rather a consensus on this point?
At this point, can we still be surprised to learn that the official report of the inquiry commission on September 11 in no time mentions the testimony of Commissioner Gregory?
And speaking of the appearance of the first plane, take a moment to point out Online reported that Marc Birnbach, the American channel Fox, a few minutes of seeing his eyes one of the planes flying over Manhattan.
"Presenter: 'We've Marc Birnbach, an employee of Fox, on the phone with us. Marc could see what happened, from what we're told. Mark, were you close enough to see any listing on the plane? "
Marc Birnbach: "Hello gentlemen. Yes, there was definitely a blue logo and a circular logo on the front of the plane, yes, it was forward. It was not like definitely not a commercial plane, I saw no window on the side and it was definitely very low. I'm absolutely shocked, I can not believe what I have just seen. "
Presenter: 'Well we are all shaken by this. We are looking right now live pictures. The upper floors of the World Trade Center in Manhattan in flames now, after two large aircraft - it is question of two airliners - is apparently being crushed against the front at about 9 o'clock this morning. Mark, if what you say is true, it was perhaps cargo aircraft [military] or something like that. You say you do not preview window on the side? "
Marc Birnbach: "I saw no window on the side, I saw the plane flying low. I was probably a square subway in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low. Again, this was not a normal aircraft like the ones I always saw at an airport. It was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it seemed out of place here. " [...]» W218
Manufactured damage as strange : The cameras of television stations located on the roof of the World Trade Center were unusually off-duty that morning, as we shall see a little further.
*****
Enchaînons with another interview excerpt of the tactical team of 11 September, it made November 7, 2001 with Captain Karin Deshors.
"[...] Then I began to heal everyone and people had calmed down a bit here. Like I said, [we] maybe 10, 12 at that time. At this point, I was also looking after two elderly women. So we were maybe 12 people. I then went outside to see what I could do, and when I saw the second building of the World Trade Center, I did not know that the first collapsed.
Around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash appeared. At first it was just one flash. Then this flash began to appear throughout the building and the building began to explode. Noise [was] dry, and each of these popping sounds came from the building a first flash orange, then red, and then it happened again throughout the building on both fronts as far as I could see. Sounds dry and explosions were intensifying, from top to bottom and throughout the building. [...]» H4
We can add the words of Captain Karin Deshors in the balance. Note again that this testimony was not considered important enough to be in the report of the inquiry of September 11.
then move on with the testimony of EMT Jason Charles, also raised by officials of the tactical team's Sept. 11, dated January 23, 2002.
"I [...] asked these guys if they were entering the building. He said yes. The only reason I am not entering the building, because I knew the commercial level [ground floor] was completely dust and it would have been virtually suicide for me to get there in it without protection.
[...] So, returning at 222 Broadway, we went inside and I started to tell everyone 'Look, I failed to find any equipment, but we will have to leave here because the Tower 1 [North] will collapse. " A sergeant, a sergeant police officer said, 'Do not tell them that, do not tell them that. " I answer, 'What?'. Then he did - - when I said 'Okay, whatever, forget it, if it so I can not say more. " Then I said 'Okay, ladies and gentlemen, if we are to do this, we will leave here and we will walk east to the River. [...]
We started to walk to this area and I heard an explosion at ground level, so I said 'fucking shit', and then we heard the din of metal twisting again. So I said 'shit' and everyone started running and I started running behind them, and we arrived at the door. [...]» H1
This in turn provides evidence of three elements of particular interest. Again, it is not surprising that the level of trading one of the towers was completely ˝ ˝ dust while explosions occurred some 80 floors up? Images have also been filmed on the ground floor in the minutes before the collapse damage and reveal a breathtaking scale.
The official says the explosion caused by the impact of the plane spread through elevator shafts, that is to say a distance of over 1000 feet (300 meters), then cause an almost total destruction in this location. Nothing better than watching the images to understand the extent of the damage.
Also, why the medic saw himself be banned by an unidentified sergeant to warn people that the tower would collapse? And why the Commission of Inquiry not asked it not to Jason Charles to name or describe the sergeant to find out how it had learned that the tower was about to collapse? But above all, why should he remain secret? Once again, we find no trace of the testimony in the official report of the inquiry.
Moreover, it seems important to note that Charles also reported hearing an explosion at ground level ˝ ˝ just before the tower collapsed. This coincides Does not the theory of the demolition by explosives, especially when combined with testimony from people who saw flashes revealed a all over the building before it collapses?
now observe an excerpt from an interview with the firefighter Thomas Turilli, held January 17, 2002. To lie, her story begins when he was in the hotel lobby of the World Trade Center (Building 3), adjacent to the two towers.
"The door [...] [the elevator] was closed, they [other fighters] have started to rise and then, after what seemed to me a few seconds, we heard what sounded like virtually this day in exploding bombs, which were boom boom boom, about seven or eight times, and then a huge gust of air came and my boss we all literally clinging to us and thrown to the ground by jumping on us, lying to us. There were tiles and a bunch of things that fell. The lights were still burning at this moment, then suddenly they went out and could not see anything. [...]» W4
Once again, this firefighter describes what it appeared to be bombs, about seven or eight, followed by a huge breath of air. Then when it came out of the hotel, Turilli realized that the South Tower had just collapsed. Continue with another section of his testimony, about 30 minutes later the same day.
"[...] Then we went back to walk towards the tower 1 [North] and a cop and a battalion chief came to us and told us to run the other direction. The other tower would collapse.
Question: ˝ Who told you that? A cop? ˝
Answer: ˝ A cop and a battalion commander. We stood near them. I stayed with him - I was with the battalion chief at a time and I started running up the street and have somewhat lost sight of all the guys who I was. The other two guys that I brought myself to the ambulance, the paramedic said, 'You must get out of the ambulance. " They then started running towards the water. We started running, I, the battalion commander, the officer, lieutenant was with me at this moment, on West Street, and then we heard a roar, a huge roar, and I just dived under a car with a guy from vehicle 138, I think. The tower fell, the second tower fell. [...]» W4
Thus, the police and the colonel has made it clear Turilli to the collapse of the north tower before it happens. Continuing with this excerpt from the interview Firefighter Patrick Martin, which took place January 28, 2002.
"[...] We looked up. We could see the smoke. We did not receive special assignment at the time. Our lieutenant returned. I do not remember if that's where he gave us the assignment that we had to do, but it is at this precise moment that we heard the noise.
My lieutenant said he looked to the first floor, and he then saw the first floor the South Tower explode. I looked up. I looked up and the sky was filled with a cloud of debris. We could see debris falling in our direction. We stood just below.
At this time, we made a 180 degrees and we started running south on West Street. [...]» W5
Here again a testimony indicating an explosion at ground level, at the exact moment the top of the building began to crumble. Yet the official version claims that it is the extreme intensity of lights located at the top of the skyscraper who was responsible for the collapse of the structure - top to bottom - which supposedly weakened the steel here. Then there was the
About Teresa Veliz, an employee working for a software development company in the North Tower. It was the 47th floor where Flight 11 crashed into the building a few dozen stories above. The following quote is from the book 'September 11: An oral history' Dean E. Murphy.
"[...] ˝ I left [the elevator], I turned the corner and I opened the door of the women's restroom. I said hello to a woman which looked at herself in the mirror and then the building has been shaken. I thought it was an earthquake. Then I heard loud noises on the other side of the wall. It seemed that someone had cut the cables of the elevator. [...]
But I have not had much time to be upset because the building shook again, more violently this time.
˝ [...] In total darkness, Veliz and his co-worker followed someone holding a flashlight.
˝ The flashlight led us to the Borders bookstore, then an elevator and finally we came out on Church Street. There were explosions everywhere. I was convinced that bombs had been placed throughout the site and someone was sitting at a control panel and pressed the detonation button. I was afraid to go down Church Street to Broadway, but I had to do it. I ended up on Vesey Street. There was another explosion. And another. I did not know where to run. [...]» W155
It is interesting to note that the second quake which shook the building was even more violent than the first, which should logically have been caused by the impact of the aircraft. What therefore could shake the building more than the impact of a Boeing 767? Let us also
About Firefighter Edward Cachia, also available via the archives of The New York Times.
"[...] As my officer and I watched the South Tower, she relented. She actually sold to a floor below, not the floor where the plane hit, because we thought at first that there was a detonation of explosives inside, because there was estate boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower has collapsed. [...]» W154
His comments speak for themselves. Then look at what the fireman said Louie Cacchioli in the famous People magazine, edition of the aftermath of the tragedy, September 12, 2001.
"[...] We were the first in the second tower after the plane struck. I escorted firefighters by the elevator to the 24th floor to be in position to evacuate workers. The last time we went, a bomb exploded. We believe that bombs were installed in the building. I asked another firefighter to stay with me, [...]» H5
What is particularly interesting in the case of the firefighter Louie Cacchioli is this subsequent interview conducted with him in the summer of 2005 by the Arctic Beacon, published in the July 19 same year. Here's an excerpt.
"[...] Four years have passed and Cacchioli has not talked much about the nightmare he lived through Sept. 11. First, it did not really talk about it. Then it was enough that his words are handled by the Commission of Inquiry on Sept. 11, and finally, the New York media have never actually tried to contact him for an authentic version of what he had seen and heard in the north tower just before it collapses.
Initially, September 12, 2001, People magazine had published a few short paragraphs on this veteran firefighter from New York, with over twenty years experience, who heard what had appeared to be bombs exploding in the north tower.
short and good, that's what it was. A few words about bombs exploding, but these words were repeated and repeated, story after story, by authors and presenters who gave themselves yet never bother to talk to him directly.
Moreover, Cacchioli was upset that People magazine had misquoted, saying ˝ ˝ a bomb exploded in the building when he said he had heard what sounded like ˝ bombs without ˝ definitive evidence that bombs had exploded.
After this unfortunate blunder journalism, a little angry and a little disgusted, he melted into the background of New York, his story appearing in a book titled little-known American Spirit ˝ ˝, and his testimony made in 2004 in private before the commission investigating the September 11 was never released in the final report of the commission.
[...] While the scene at the Marriott Hotel was horrible, the north tower looked like a war zone. Initially, his team had been ordered to go to the South Tower, but it was toward the next round in confusion, a twist of fate that saved his life.
When finally entered the lobby of the north tower, Cacchioli remembers that the elevator doors were completely blown, and it was another scene of total chaos with people running and screaming, being struck by debris.
˝ I remember thinking to myself, my God, how did this all have happened so quickly because a plane hit the top completely? It made no sense ˝, said Cacchioli.
[...] So he rode with his colleagues trucks 21, 22 and Section 13, the doors opened on the 24th floor before a scene that was once little meaning for the firefighter veteran, who considered that the large amount of dust and smoke that were there were abnormal compared to the place that had been struck.
˝ Tommy Hetzel was with me and everyone else is out of the elevator when it stopped on the 24th floor ˝, said Cacchioli. ˝ It was filled with smoke. Tommy and I were forced to descend by elevator to pick up tools, and as soon as the elevator was shut on us, we heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb. It was a noise so loud, the lights went out and the elevator stopped.
˝ ˝ Luckily, we were not caught between floors and we were able to force doors. People were in panic, they cried loudly. And meanwhile, I crawled on the ground and I walked in the dark with a flashlight down stairs thinking that Tommy was behind me.
˝ ˝ I found a way to reach the stairs and more people were there. When I started heading down, another explosion like the first hit. It arrived about two minutes later, though it is difficult to say, but I thought 'Oh my God, these bastards have placed bombs here as they did in 1993!' ˝
˝ But still, it never crossed my mind that the building might collapse.
˝ [...]
Cacchioli was called to testify in private, but he left before several members of the Committee have been completed, with the feeling of being questioned and cons-examined rather than being simply able to say the truth about what happened in the North Tower on Sept. 11.
˝ My story was never mentioned in the final report and I felt like a trial in a courtroom ˝, said Cacchioli. ˝ I finally out. They tried to manipulate my words and to adjust the story with only what they wanted to hear. All I wanted to do was tell the truth and when I saw that they would not let me do that, I'm out.
˝ ˝ It was a real shame for everyone, victims and family members who lost loved ones. I am not in agreement with the commission on Sept. 11. All that experience has been horrible.
[...] Asked whether he has been forced to keep quiet about his experience September 11, he added:
˝ Nobody bothered me. I do not think I have reason to be worried. I know what happened that day and I know the whole truth is not yet known. I have my own conscience, my own mind and person, and I mean nobody, will force Lou Cacchioli to say something that does not happen and that is not true. [...]» ˝ W6
Multiple
huge explosions and a commission of inquiry later attempted to manipulate his words, "that speaks volumes.
Now consider the words of William Rodriguez, servant maintenance of the World Trade Center when the attacks. It is publicly recognized as the last survivor to be pulled from the wreckage. Here he delivers his report when he was in the basement of the north tower.
"[...] Suddenly, we heard BOOM! I thought it was a generator that had exploded in the basement. So I said to myself 'Oh my God! I think that is the generator '. I was about to go to work and I still had not finished telling me these words to myself when I heard BOOM from very high [the building]. There was a distinction between the sound from the basement and the one who came from above. Everyone started screaming, and someone came into the office shouting 'explosion, explosion, explosion! ". His arms were open, and his skin hung on his arm to his fingertips. [...] "
Again, two separate explosions almost simultaneously, however first came clear by Mr. Rodriguez in the basement of the skyscraper, followed by the second, this one much higher. But why would there was an explosion at the base of the tower before the one caused by the impact the plane?
Moreover, the remarks of William Rodriguez are corroborated by those of Anthony Saltalamacia, supervisor of a hundred workers at the World Trade Center when tragedy. It was at the underground level B1 of the North Tower with Mr. Rodriguez during the first impact. Here are his words.
"[...] Initially, we thought that the explosion came from the mechanical room. Then we heard a series of additional explosions appeared to originate from the upper floors of the building and that's when we realized there was something wrong no, it was a major problem. [...] Then, about 14-15 people came running and shouting in our office. [...] A black man entered the office, he was trembling and seemed in shock. He had multiple injuries, his arms were bleeding, his skin was torn away, was something very painful to watch. [...] While we were there, more explosions took place, lots of yelling, confusion, and that's when William said it was time to leave the building. We're all gone. It was filled with smoke [...]. From 8:46 until I kind of building, explosions were so many, I would say that I heard at least ten. [...] "
then observe the passage of testimony of EMT Richard Zarrillo. This interview, conducted October 25, 2001, is also among the archives of the New York Times.
"[...] As I walked toward the command post of the fire department, I met Steve Mosiello. I said, 'Steve, where's the boss? I must convey a message to him. " He said 'Well, what is the message? " I said 'The buildings will collapse. We have to evacuate everyone. " With a look very confused, he asked me who told me this. I told him that I found myself at the moment with John at OEM [Office of Emergency Management]. The OEM says the buildings will collapse, we must leave.
He escorted me to Chief Ganci. He said, 'Hey, Pete, we have a message that buildings will collapse. He said, 'Holy shit, who told you that? " So Steve and I brought before the Chief Ganci, Commissioner Feehan, Steve, and I think the Chief Turi was initially there, I said, 'Look, I get just the OEM. The message they gave me is that buildings will collapse, that we must evacuate our world. " At that time, this huge roar arose and that is where the building collapsed, the first tower collapsed. [...]» W70
Here again is a clear and sharp as the collapse of the twin towers was not a surprise to everyone. It is also important to note that the warning Zarrillo on both rounds.
's continue with a flurry of snippets testimonies from firefighters at the scene, more specifically about the collapse of Building 7, which was not hit by any airplane. Recall once more than ever in history did a skyscraper collapsed due to fire except the three towers Sept. 11, 2001.
Let's start with the comments of firefighter Thomas Smith, also archived by the New York Times.
"[...] They asked me to get away from our truck because the [Building] 7 was in danger, then they have everybody back and they sent us to the rear end Vesey Street. We remained standing there for half an hour, forty minutes, because the [Building] 7 would collapse imminently and eventually collapsed. [...]» W28
Here then reviews the firefighter Vincent Massa.
"[...] I remember that later in the day, while we expected that [Building] 7 collapses, they constantly repelled us on [the street] Vesey, on almost a full city block. They were worried about the fall of the [Building] 7, and we moved constantly, they had established a perimeter of collapse and they had us back. [...]» W29
A perimeter of collapse? Continue with what the firefighter Tiernach Cassidy.
"[...] So as I said, building 7 was going to collapse imminently. They sounded the sirens. They told everyone to clear the perimeter until it is no more a single civilian. We tried another quick search while we could, but then they do not allow us to stay there longer. So we left the perimeter. Our meeting point was at that moment on Vesey. [...]» W30
Here also
About Indira Singh, a volunteer rescuer, from an interview broadcast on radio station KPFA FM in Berkeley, California.
"We had to evacuate [...] this particular yard, just after noon on Sept. 11 because they had told us that Building 7 was on the verge of collapse. [...] I think they did it collapse because I heard they were going to drop it because it was unstable because of collateral damage. [...] There was another panic around 16 hours because they would cause the collapse of the building and the people seemed be informed in advance, so people were panicking again and running. [...]» W31
look also had this to say the rescuer Joseph Fortis.
"[...] When the third building collapsed, we were on the street corner opposite the school, and everyone standing there waiting. They had us pushed back earlier, almost an hour before, because they were confident - they knew he was going to collapse, but they were not sure. So they pushed back everyone, and everyone stood there waiting and we're just stayed there to wait again and again until it collapses, because it was not safe. [...]» W32
Let then this excerpt from the report of Fire Chief Thomas McCarthy.
"[...] So when I arrived at the controls, there was a huge gathering of guys [firefighters] who stood there. They were just waiting for that [Building] 7 collapses. [...] I went down Vesey Street up to the bridge of Building 7. People told me not to stay there, it was going to collapse. [...] So this time, we were a little leery of the strength gateway, so no one ventured, and they said that the [Building] 7 would collapse. They chased everyone from the block. [...]» W33
Let also about the firefighter Edward Kennedy.
"[...] It is the only Mayday that I remember, and to tell you the truth, the only guy who spoke on our radio that comes to mind is the Chief Visconti. I remember he spoke and he gave instructions on this and that. [...] I remember screaming about the [Building] 7, number 7, he wanted everybody away from 7 because 7, was finally collapse, they did not know when, but it would definitely break down, we were only away from the perimeter, everyone had to pack, make sure that we were far, that was an order, you know, things like that. [...]» W34
We could go on much longer. However, the obvious question is obvious: how could people be aware that Building 7 was about to collapse, the point of establishing a perimeter of collapse, while never in the no other story building not collapsed due to fire? Let us not forget that photos and video of Building 7 in the moments before his fall betray no indication of a skyscraper about to yield. Quite the contrary. But let
still an eye on a final report of a witness, precisely that of Fire Chief Nick Visconti delegate. The following excerpt is from the September 2002 issue of Firehouse magazine, specializing in service to protect against fires.
"[...] While the World Trade Center 7 was burning, I thought to myself, how is it they do not attempt to extinguish the fire? [...] At one point, Frank Fellini said, 'we have hundreds of guys here, only the side of West Street'. He said, 'Nick, it is necessary that you take away this world of this place. " I thought to myself, 'Where?'. 'Frank, what do you ask me, Chief? " He said the World Trade Center 7, imminent collapse, we must keep people away from this place. " [...] There were a few heads out there that I knew and I called them individually. I told them, 'Listen, start to push the people we must back up to the command. While this was done, I met various officers. I hissed, 'Captain, bring your boys over here'. I met resistance. The most common reaction was' Hey, we still have people here, we do not want to leave. " I explained that we were worried about Building 7, he would fall and that we did not want anyone being caught in the collapse. One comment was' Oh, this building will never crumble, it has not been hit by a plane, why is there someone who extinguished the fire? " There were many comments, some resistance, resistance understandable. [...]» W35
Yet, while several buildings were damaged far more than him at the fall of the towers (see photos attached - PH-8.1 to 8.17 and 9.1 to 9.12) without falling apart The Building 7 fell symmetrically on himself after a perimeter of collapse has been erected.
Here are a few pictures of the surrounding buildings.
Let us recall at this point reviews Larry Silverstein, owner of World Trade Center 'and They Made That decision to pull and Then We watched The Building collapse' (in French, as the jargon of demolition, if they took the decision to throw down ').
In fact, adding that even Larry Silverstein, whose offices were located on the 88th floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center, was a reason for not gold be at work this morning. Let this short excerpt from the New York magazine care to explain why the wealthy and any new owner of the complex escaped death.
"On the morning of September 11, 2001, Silverstein was in his apartment on Park Avenue and quarreled with his wife Klara about the fact that he had to go to work, on the 88th floor of the north tower, where he transferred the offices of his company.
Klara gave her a glazed look. Silverstein had an appointment with a dermatologist - after spending his life to sail, he had problems with facial carcinomas - and it was impossible to miss this rendezvous. ˝ Then you will be at work early tomorrow ˝, "she had said. [...]» W124
The New York Observer also confirmed the information, adding that even his side ˝ his son Roger, and his daughter Lisa, worked for him in his temporary offices of the 88th floor of the north tower of the WTC. Regular meetings with tenants were held each morning at Windows on the World [luxurious restaurant the 107th floor of the north tower] in the weeks immediately following his possession July 26, 2001. But Sept. 11, Roger and Lisa Silverstein were overdue.
˝ W125
So let's add the appointment of Silverstein dermatologist and the delay of his two children die in the accident ...
*** ** All
were not so lucky on the day of 11 September. The case of John O'Neill is indeed inevitable in a book like this one. To better situate the context, let's see what CNN reported in its edition of September 22, 2001.
"The body of John P. O'Neill, former FBI assistant director and a terrorism expert, was found Friday through the rubble of the World Trade Center.
O'Neill had recently resigned from the FBI and had just taken over security at the World Trade Center, said the police commissioner of New York, Bernard Kerik.
'That Tuesday was his first or second day at work', Kerik said Friday at a interview on Larry King Live on CNN. [...]
O'Neill, 50, was head of operations for international terrorism for the FBI. [...]» W193
What bad luck, then, for John O'Neill to the end of August 2001, was still leading the operations related to international terrorism for the FBI. Some will probably be tempted to argue that U.S. intelligence played bad luck upon the death of one of their experts on the most notorious terrorist. After all, O'Neill himself had led multiple investigations into Osama bin Laden in previous years, including the first attack against the World Trade Center in 1993 on the bomb attack at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, which had left 19 U.S. casualties in 1996 and the suicide bombing against the USS Cole in port in Yemen in 2000, during which 17 sailors were killed.
However, the story takes a rather unique twist when we discover why John O'Neill left the FBI just weeks before September 11, 2001: Like many of his colleagues in the agency at the time, O'Neill was frustrated his investigations into the Bin Laden family being blocked by his superiors. Here's what the New York Times reported November 12, 2001.
"A former counterterrorism official with the FBI, who was killed at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, had complained bitterly that this was the United States was unwilling to confront Saudi Arabia about Osama Bin Laden and that oil was dictating American foreign policy, according to a new book published in France.
The former head, John P. O'Neill was the director of the division's anti-terrorism office New York when he resigned in August to become chief of security at the twin towers. [...]
One of the co-authors of the book [bin Laden - The Forbidden Truth], Jean-Charles Brisard, a security expert who spent several years examining the financial empire of Mr. Bin Laden says in the book have met Mr. O'Neill in June and July. [...]
late July, said [Brisard], they met alone in New York for a drink and dinner, and Mr. O'Neill complained that the FBI was not free to act in its investigations of international terrorism because the State Department interfered constantly. [...]
O'Neill's frustration with regard to the State Department had a secret. [...]» W194
other words, the frustration of John O'Neill, were clearly uncomfortable for some people become influential in the summer of 2001. What a sad coincidence, then, he has started this new job as head of security at the World Trade Center on September 11 or 10. Needless to mention that since the events of 2001, the timing of his transfer job feeds Posthumous many rumors about it: who was well able to offer him the job at the World Trade Center?
added that the book 'The Forbidden Truth', Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, unveiled in the summer of 2001, several months of diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan peaked . These efforts on the part of Americans, say Brisard and Dasquie, would have had to convince the Taliban to accept a major pipeline through Afghanistan to carry oil to the Indian Ocean, allowing U.S. compete with Russia on access to highly coveted oil resources of the Middle East.
However, 'The Forbidden Truth, argues that the summer of 2001, before the deadlock which existed in the discussions between the two parties, while American diplomats have expressed a clear ultimatum to the Taliban:' Accept our offer of a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs is that you will receive. " We note in passing that this information is corroborated by the BBC article, quoted at the beginning of work, about Niaz Naik, former Foreign Secretary Pakistan, which claimed that the U.S. planned from July 2001 to attack Afghanistan in the fall. I2
But back a little on the Building 7. It is important to note that no mention is made of its collapse in the official report of 567 pages of the inquiry. Does this suggest that the collapse of a skyscraper of 47 floors was not important enough for inclusion in the final report?
It is however possible to find other very useful information about it: Chapter 1 of the June 2004 report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - an agency Fed - on the World Trade Center complex tells us inter alia that the fire detection system of WTC 7 had been curiously programmed early on the morning of September 11 so that any warning is ignored for a period of eight hours.
Observe the following passage carefully.
"[...] Trouvaille 2.25: The fire alarm system controlling the WTC 7 sent only one signal to the company that oversees it (10: 00: 02am, shortly after the collapse of WTC 2) indicating a fire situation in the building Sept. 11, 2001. This signal contained no specific information about the location of the fire inside the building. In the eyes of the surveillance department of the alarm system, the building consisted of just one area, 'AREA 1'. The fire alarm system of the building had been placed on the test mode for a period of eight hours beginning at 6: 47: 03 the morning of September 11, 2001. Ordinarily, this command is enabled when maintenance or other tests are performed on the system so that all alarms received by the system are perceived as being the result maintenance or testing and are ignored. The monitoring company has informed NIST that in the case of systems placed in test mode, alarm signals are not displayed on the screen of the operator, but the archives of the alarm are stored in the history. [...]» W123
In other words, no alarm was sent to operators of Building 7 of the control center alarm systems up to about 15h in the afternoon of September 11. Which was therefore placed in the alarm system TEST mode this morning, and why? That is again an issue that the inquiry did not consider it necessary to reply. Furthermore, recall that the system of automatic fire extinguishing of Building 7 was strangely off that day.
It would also be difficult not to mention a more recent development concerning exactly what Building 7, commonly known as the Salomon Brothers Building. Towards the end of February 2007, a video sequence of a newscast for the BBC from their live coverage of the September 11 attacks resurfaced on the Internet. A curious feature, however, accompanied these images to a panoramic view of the skyscrapers of Manhattan overhung by dense smoke caused by the recent fall of the twin towers, the reporter Jane Standley, BBC correspondent in New York, announced candidly collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building. A minor detail, however, eluded him: the building in question was still clearly visible behind her yet!
Thus, one can see live Jane Standley discuss the collapse of Building 7 for several minutes with the presenter in the studio, before the satellite transmission is scrambled and finally cut off. It is about 25 minutes later than the collapsed Building 7 actually, to 17.20.
This raises an obvious question, of course: where the BBC she received information that the building had collapsed, nearly half an hour before it happens? In a statement published on the official website of the BBC February 27, 2007, Richard Porter, head of news service, attempted to clarify the situation following an avalanche of comments and questions provoked by this video sequence.
"[...] Some websites use a sequence of a news bulletin from the BBC's World September 11, 2001 to suggest that we have participated actively in some form of manipulation of the hearing. Result, we receive many emails asking us to clarify our position. So here.
We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody dictated what to say or do on September 11. We were not informed in advance that buildings would collapse. We have not received any press releases or scripts before events occur.
In the chaos and confusion of the day, I am sure we said things that have been proven wrong or inaccurate - but at that time, they were based on the best information we had. [...]
We no longer have in our possession the original recordings of our coverage of September 11 (due to a blunder, not a conspiracy). [...]
If we reported that the building collapsed before it happens, then this is a mistake - nothing else. [...]» W80
instance, the BBC, surely one of the most important news channels in the world, would have 'lost' recordings of the most decisive event of the 21st century. Could also learn why the error related precisely the Building 7 and not one or the other of the surrounding buildings - yet most damaged and located closer to the two towers. Would it not have been more plausible and understandable that an announcement of the accidental sort has occurred about one of the many skyscrapers being damaged? And whose owner was other than Larry Silverstein?
Still a wind of change is felt on the media boudage Building 7 which has long been. In 2007, for example, the popular TV host Rosie O'Donnell undertook to tackle the slippery subject of comments by more frequent about the implausibility of the official version on the collapse of this building.
Towards the end of March 2007, O'Donnell went to state clearly in his prime time show 'The View' that it seemed impossible that this skyscraper has collapsed without use of explosives. Strangely, only the station Fox News had treated the story later, commentator Bill O'Reilly insulting O'Donnell and demanding his dismissal. Guests the issuance of O'Reilly even allowed to go to ask that it be hung for treason or put in jail. Besides the partisan reaction to Fox News, however, other television and most print media remained silent about this.
A Canadian editorial drew attention anyway. Here's an excerpt, published March 26, 2007 in the Calgary Herald.
"Now that Rosie O'Donnell is trying to bring the topic on The View, I think we can talk here.
First, a news quiz. If, for some time after the collapse of Towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center, an office building of 47 storeys had also struck the ground in a large U.S. city, do you think you might know?
course you would.
But if I told you that such an event actually happened, can you name this building? If you're like most North Americans, I guess you probably would not.
In fact, the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building, which was also known under the name of WTC7, which stood at two quadrilaterals Ground Zero [sic], occurred later in the day on September 11, 2001.
This remains one of the central anomaly of a day filled with anomalies, yet this was then processed, and it remains so today in the official records at least as an insignificant footnote page.
struck by any aircraft and little debris, WTC 7 still had small fires mysteriously burned on several of its middle floors. Judging by the photographs, one can assume that these fires have been easily contained. Yet
at 17:20 in space 6.5 seconds, or nearly the speed of freefall, WTC 7 collapsed completely on itself. This should have made headlines, only by the fact that he was the first building steel structure to collapse in history, exclusively due to fire. But for some reason, journalists avoided the subject.
Shortly after Sept. 11, when the Associated Press published its chronology of events entitled 'A stunning 48 hours of news [48 hours of stunning news] WTC 7 was not mentioned at all. Any more than the official government report on September 11. And so far, authorities have released a preliminary version of a report inconclusive as to why the building collapsed. [...]
What it is unlikely that you've seen video images of the collapse exist (and can be found on the internet). The sequences show the signs of a controlled demolition, including spurts of dust from what appears to be several tiny explosions and sudden drops like a curtain, the entire structure.
During the brief moments before the WTC 7 did disappear into the memory hole, the presenter of CBS, Dan Rather, and presented the video: ˝ For the third time today, it evokes those images we all have too seen on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite.
˝ Many concluded that it was precisely the case. Moreover, it was discovered that the WTC7 had unusual tenants, including several floors devoted respectively to the FBI, the CIA headquarters and emergencies Mayor Giuliani. It was also the domicile of a legal subsidiary of the Securities and Exchange Commission [stock market] which allegedly contained evidence related to many ongoing investigations concerning cases of malpractice market.
A television documentary showed the PBS station later the owner of the WTC, Larry Silverstein, describing his reaction that day. ˝ We have already suffered a terrible loss of lives, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it * * and they made that decision to pull * * and then we watched the building collapse. ˝
[...] Finally, Department of the unusual has happened to us another dramatic turn of events this year. Some researchers have unearthed a bulletin from the BBC television dated 11 September, in which the reporter announces the collapse of WTC 7. Strangely, however, the building is still clearly visible over his right shoulder and did not collapse before another 20 minutes more.
Finally, if the world does not come at the end of this story, maybe Rosie will succeed. "W95
noted that Rosie O'Donnell left The View suddenly less than a month after his statements on the About ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment