Let me first share with you a personal experience with relevance to this work seems clear. In the summer of 2002, after college in journalism and arts and letters, I took the exciting opportunity to replace a journalist in a local newspaper in Quebec during the summer holiday period. Being assigned to the most varied subjects, I had the privileged opportunity to observe first-hand the inner workings of a newsroom.
I remember especially the anecdote here. One day, a colleague approached me a press release bearing the words 'For Immediate Release' hand. He wanted me to write a short article on this subject. My reaction was spontaneous: I wanted to confirm the information contained in the press to ensure the validity thereof. Tit for tat, my colleague replied 'No need to confirm anything, this release comes from the government. Everything you need to do is to reformulate slightly what is there. " Astonished, I then complied, thinking, 'Oh, it's easier than I thought. "
Although the significance of this experience escaped me at the time, I finally seized the entire range of current writing of this synthesis: the government have provided some form of safe-conduct preventing them from being subject to verification prior to publication. Result, newspaper readers - and viewers and radio listeners, by extension - are unwittingly information that is not always duly verified by the media. Depending on the extent of this practice, a powerful tool of disinformation can potentially get out.
Meanwhile, media coverage of the September 11 attacks appears to me equally inédaquate of silence maintained by the far to the rational and justified in questioning should elicit many irregularities surrounding these momentous events. Indeed, a member point of view, I think fundamental that people can count on its media to inform them of such anomalies. But apparently we wait much longer if we continue to rely solely on them. This is also one of the reasons I wanted to share this information as objectively as possible. As
nevertheless aware that my opinion has transpired repeatedly simply by nature of this work, allow me here to speak straightforwardly: I feel that the official version of the September 11 attacks is wrong .
That said, I tried somehow to impose the reader with no alternative theory about these terrible events. I rather tried to explain the facts and the superimposed on the official version. Everyone is free to subsequently judge the credibility and reasonableness thereof. Generally, I consider that such an approach promotes the questioning in individuals. And it is precisely the goal sought by this test: to make people think.
There is, after all plenty of points of constructive dialogue to enable us to question the official version. Just think of the attack plans on Iraq and Afghanistan, drafted long before the attacks of September 2001. It also comes in mind the Building 7, the building 47-story housing various secret agencies that collapsed on itself without being hit by an airplane, this was then followed by a media blackout almost complete.
Consider also the period of 441 days elapsed before the opening of a public inquiry 'independent', launched by the White House and consists exclusively of American politicians with all conflicts of interest, after President Bush is obstinately opposed to the creation of it. Also take into account the many ridiculous statements of that committee of Inquiry, which stated inter alia that it was not important to know the origin of the money used to finance attacks. Delivering more than one quarter of the final report of the commission is based on interrogations of detainees being tortured.
us remember more than the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed on themselves at nearly the speed of freefall, without the intact lower floors have yet offered significant resistance. Be aware that fires can not explain the presence of molten steel in the rubble, several weeks after the events. Keep in mind the existence of significant peaks of seismic activity recorded at the beginning of the collapse of the towers, they are equivalent to more than 20 times the amplitude of seismic waves caused by the subsequent fall of debris. Let
has dozens of highly credible testimony of individuals, yet ignored by the inquiry, who reported explosions and flashes at the World Trade Center. Consider then the fact that a significant amount of gold was found in a tunnel of delivery, and near a truck out of its vaults, without any corpse was discovered nearby. And do not forget that the eight black boxes normally indestructible, only three were found and used out, while various passports and identity cards of suspected terrorists survived the same conditions.
Consider also the absence of the many promotions and dismissals that followed the failure to prevent intelligence agencies, as well as the unusual exemption for air defense protocols despite the rain warnings before the attacks. Let us remember all these suspicious military exercises held on the morning of Sept. 11, which one simulated by chance the crash of an airplane against a government building just outside Washington. Let us furthermore that no fighter plane was assigned that morning at Andrews Air Force Base, charged with protecting the capital of the United States.
Keep in mind that the damage at the Pentagon seemed far below those that would have let Boeing, and no image showing clearly what has really struck the building has yet been made public. Furthermore, note that the report of the inquiry failed to mention the testimony the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, which stated that staff had held a PEOC to count the distance between Washington and Flight 77 until it crashed into the Pentagon, the official report stating that no more warning was not received regarding this flight. Also realize the complexity of the maneuvers executed by the alleged terrorist at the controls of Flight 77 two weeks after it was deemed unfit to fly a Cessna.
Then, consider the fact that investigations into Osama bin Laden - and his family - were blocked by the Bush and Clinton administrations before the attacks, even though it was one of the most wanted men on the planet. Recall that in the days following the attacks, several of his relatives were hastily evacuated from the country by the U.S. secret services, without first being interviewed, and despite the ban on federal theft. Let us not forget that Osama Bin Laden worked for the benefit of the CIA during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 80s, and that his family has maintained close ties with the Bush family for many years. Let us remember then the lack of reaction when U.S. President was informed that the U.S. was under attack.
ask ourselves why more of the suspected terrorists were still alive after 11 September, the FBI still continuing to designate them as guilty. Keep in mind that many of them had been identified by U.S. intelligence for over a year before the attacks, and two of them have even lived with an FBI agent.
Let us also that debris from Flight 93 were found up to eight miles [13 kilometers] round, so that no trace of the aircraft itself has survived the crash site. Remember that witnesses heard a missile at Shanksville this morning, and others have reported that they saw flames in the sky.
Note again the lack of resolution, more than seven years later, in investigating the unusual movement of stock shares and millions of dollars suddenly routed through computers in the World Trade Center attacks at the precise moment . Let's not forget all the evidence destroyed, including records of Able Danger on terrorists, the huge piles of documents to the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, cassette declarations of air traffic controllers, as well as steel from the World Trade Center that was eagerly recycled without being analyzed.
then see the illogic of the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan following the attacks, despite the involvement of ISI in financing the attacks. Keep in mind that a Pakistani general, chief of the intelligence services, has made a transfer of $ 100 000 to Mohammed Atta, mastermind of the terrorists, and then lunched with leaders of U.S. intelligence committees in Washington while the aircraft hitting the towers. Not to mention that the brother of Osama bin Laden was on his side, with George HW Bush at the same time.
But in fact the primary reason to question the official version is probably all of its inconsistency. That's what keeps me personally to give him any credibility. The narration of such a history, full of so many coincidences and tangled contradictions major plank in my opinion ridiculous and shows the improbability of the events as described by the government.
And the saddest, ultimately, is the misuse by our leaders of the terrorist threat to gradually erode our civil liberties. I realize that people, naive or uninformed, blindly agree to abandon their rights and freedoms. I note that throughout history, individuals in positions of power have sought to dominate the world. Why should it be different today?
What reassures me however, is that on each occasion in the past, people were able to draw enough energy and courage to combat and overcome the tyranny of their time. Today, that same struggle seems to come back. Moreover, I am not surprised that after so many years of convenience and luxury on the West, some antitheses of misery and poverty of the rest of the world we find ourselves faced with this situation. Wealth and comfort could they we have collectively numb at this point?
In this vein, I wonder now know what your own reaction, you who have just been exposed to this information. Surely those who believe with me that the official version of September 11 will be false to say that this is a situation beyond their control, as a single individual of the mass, and they can not change anything. This does, however, it would not bid silent?
Expressing disagreement with the official version, however, can manifest itself in various forms, without necessarily mounting arms or shout from the rooftops, I disapprove of reactions elsewhere. But a well placed single comment at a proper discussion, for example, recommending to another politely inquire about this already represents a step toward the destruction of popular myth. And that each of these steps, however small they may be, we must fold to reach to shake the foundations of the vulnerable and misguided war against terror.
For this unfortunate war conceals a devastating effect on the overall collective psyche, including encouraging us insidiously to be wary of strangers especially Islamic allegiance, and to maintain a fear that at any time, a threat latent hangs over our planet. 'And if the terrorists dotaient a nuclear bomb?' Worries that they more or less consciously. 'Let us sacrifice our rights for faster and more secure!' Chants while the people without identifying any machination.
I still hear some Canadian political leaders declare that the public does not fear the threat of terrorism enough. Of course, establishing quietly fear in the nation, the government implanted in us a feeling known to hatch in the form of a need for protection. This need then justifies stricter laws, more powerful, resulting in the loss of civil rights and freedoms - supposedly in order to establish more effective control measures to counter terrorism the same - and ultimately results in increased powers to a totalitarian society.
I'll be honest : Sad thoughts sometimes cross my mind. After all the efforts of our ancestors and predecessors, this generation incarnation that we ultimately fail to counter the plans of global domination of some power hungry elitists? Faced with a bleak possibility angst, I prefer to arm myself with optimism even though it appear to me more urgent to respond collectively. Indeed, time is no longer the almost dogmatic individualism for Western society.
And all things considered, the role of individuals who feel challenged by the cause of September 11 is relatively simple: when the opportunity presents itself, just awareness mentioning the need for a new international survey, truly independent this time, and to object to the loss our civil rights and liberties under the pretext of a war against terror. And those who wish to push further their involvement may also consider contacting their local media, send them the credible literature on the subject and question them in a civilized way to silence that they show.
As such, I submitted in August 2007 a draft of this book to Louis-Eric Allard, director of information for the daily La Tribune, Sherbrooke (Quebec) in order to obtain comments on the subject. Strangely, Mr. Allard then avoided for more than two months my numerous calls and gave no response to any of my messages. In November of that year, I finally resigned myself to discuss with his personal secretary, which she repeated to me so I stubbornly return the document, but agreed to answer my questions. Despite my insistence and visibly uncomfortable, she refused to give me only five times if someone had leafed through the document. I am of the opinion that before a more sustained pressure from the public, the media might react like this indefinitely.
is why I would call this the heart: find within ourselves the courage and strength to set out how we manipulate our governments, claiming the fight against terror. The Quebec and Canadian governments must stop perpetuating the strategy of global domination by Americans. Make no mistake: our government is fully aware of the information contained in this book. But it is likely that the status quo will continue until what the public demands a change.
Unlike times when men had no other choice but to fight battles with armies of murderous tyrants who were threatening us there is now much easier to smash through the power of knowledge and without any effusion of blood, the illusion created by the real terrorists, who seek to confuse our minds. Realizing that
obviously part of the solution lies in the solidarity of the peoples of the Earth rather than dividing them, division specifically sought by the architects of the war against terror. Divide and conquer ... A technique as old as the world yet!
Finally, I urge everyone who shares my beliefs about Sept. 11 to respond in a civilized and thoughtful towards this delicate situation. Are aware that propagate our views dramatically or inappropriately could unfortunately lead to some undesirable consequences.
I personally advocate a positive and peaceful at all times. It seems wise and well advised to look more than ever to live in harmony with itself and its environment in the heart of the storm in particular. For whoever reaches such a self-control in this context then covet the true freedom for all.
David Charbonneau
analysemedia911@hotmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment